Saphenous vein versus total arterial graft in coronary artery bypass graft

Authors

  • Karzan Saieamend Hamad Palani Department of Cardiac Surgery, Surgical Specialty Hospital, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-878X
  • Bashar Hanna Azar Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
  • Chalak Abdulsamad Ismael Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22122/cdj.v7i4.467

Keywords:

Saphenous Vein, Arterial Graft, Coronary Artery Bypass

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains the gold standard treatment for left main coronary artery and multivessel disease. In the last decade, arterial conduit clearly has had superiority over venous conduit. The aim of this study is to report and compare both types of conduit in Erbil Cardiac Center, Iraq.

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was used to compare patients who received total arterial grafts (n = 25) with patients who had saphenous-vein bypass grafts (n = 25), at the point of gender, age, operation duration, post-operative complications, hospital stay, and the 6-month cardiac ejection fraction (EF) improvement.

RESULTS: All patients of arterial group were men in comparison to 68% men versus 32% women in venous group; mean age of the patients was 50 years and 61 years for arterial and venous conduits, respectively. Duration of operation was 3.97 hours and 4.27 hours, hospital stay was 5.42 days and 7.20 days, and EF improvement was 11.48% and 4.40% for arterial and venous conduits, respectively. Although the duration of operation was not statistically significant, the total duration of hospital stay and EF improvement were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: Arterial conduit has started in the last decades. Although it technically needs more accuracy and time, it has a better outcome compared to the venous conduit.

References

Rihal CS, Raco DL, Gersh BJ, Yusuf S. Indications for coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic stable angina: Review of the evidence and methodological considerations. Circulation 2003; 108(20): 2439-45.

Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2011; 124(23): 2610-42.

Myers WO, Blackstone EH, Davis K, Foster ED, Kaiser GC. CASS Registry long term surgical survival. Coronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33(2): 488-98.

Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, Galbraith PD, Norris CM, Knudtson ML. Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Circulation 2002; 105(20): 2378-84.

Jokinen JJ, Hippelainen MJ, Turpeinen AK, Pitkanen O, Hartikainen JE. Health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting: A review of randomized controlled trials. J Card Surg 2010; 25(3): 309-17.

Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T, Kennedy JW, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: Overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994; 344(8922): 563-70.

Favarato ME, Hueb W, Boden WE, Lopes N, Nogueira CR, Takiuti M, et al. Quality of life in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease: A comparative post hoc analyses of medical, angioplasty or surgical strategies-MASS II trial. Int J Cardiol 2007; 116(3): 364-70.

Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR, Stahle E, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 2011; 32(17): 2125-34.

Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, Hardison RM, Kelsey SF, MacGregor JM, et al. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(24): 2503-15.

Moller CH, Perko MJ, Lund JT, Andersen LW, Kelbaek H, Madsen JK, et al. Graft patency after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients. Scand Cardiovasc J 2010; 44(3): 161-7.

Cameron AA, Green GE, Brogno DA, Thornton J. Internal thoracic artery grafts: 20-year clinical follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25(1): 188-92.

Carpentier A, Guermonprez JL, Deloche A, Frechette C, DuBost C. The aorta-to-coronary radial artery bypass graft. A technique avoiding pathological changes in grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1973; 16(2): 111-21.

Acar C, Jebara VA, Portoghese M, Beyssen B, Pagny JY, Grare P, et al. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54(4): 652-9.

Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. The right internal thoracic artery: The forgotten conduit-5,766 patients and 991 angiograms. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92(1): 9-15.

Barner HB, Swartz MT, Mudd JG, Tyras DH. Late patency of the internal mammary artery as a coronary bypass conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 1982; 34(4): 408-12.

Leavitt BJ, O'Connor GT, Olmstead EM, Morton JR, Maloney CT, Dacey LJ, et al. Use of the internal mammary artery graft and in-hospital mortality and other adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2001; 103(4): 507-12.

Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. The right internal thoracic artery: Is it underutilized? Curr Opin Cardiol 2011; 26(6): 528-35.

Buxton BF, Ruengsakulrach P, Fuller J, Rosalion A, Reid CM, Tatoulis J. The right internal thoracic artery graft--benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high grade stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18(3): 255-61.

He GW. Arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting: Biological characteristics, functional classification, and clinical choice. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67(1): 277-84.

Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. Results of 1,454 free right internal thoracic artery-to-coronary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64(5): 1263-8.

Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA, Meswani M, Theodore S, Powar N, et al. Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88(1): 23-9.

van Brussel BL, Voors AA, Ernst JM, Knaepen PJ, Plokker HW. Venous coronary artery bypass surgery: A more than 20-year follow-up study. Eur Heart J 2003; 24(10): 927-36.

Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, Houghtaling PL, Arnold JH, Akhrass R, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117(5): 855-72.

Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64(3): 599-605.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-23

How to Cite

1.
Hamad Palani KS, Hanna Azar B, Abdulsamad Ismael C. Saphenous vein versus total arterial graft in coronary artery bypass graft. Chron Dis J. 2019;7(4):266–271.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)