The overhang rate in posterior teeth restorations among a sample of patients from Sari City, Iran, in year 2017

Authors

  • Mehran Ebrahimzadeh-Hassanabadi Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4923-7645
  • Alireza Gharib Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
  • Amirhossein Moaddabi Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7456-8027

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22122/cdj.v7i3.413

Keywords:

Prevalence, Overhang, Posterior Teeth, Composite Resin Restoration

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overhang is the extension of restoration material from the prepared cavity. Restoration overhangs have an important role in plaque accumulation, caries, severe gingival inflammation, and periodontal diseases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the frequency of restoration overhanging, and the managements in order to reduce its prevalence and subsequent complications.

METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 277 patients, who had at least one restoration in the proximal surface of posterior teeth. At first, all the patients were examined using a mirror, and dental floss under the light of the dental chair. In cases in which the existence of the overhang was suspected, Bitewing radiography was operated on respective regions. Data were analyzed using SPSS software.

RESULTS: 120 teeth had overhangs (19.60%) and 492 (80.39%) exhibited no overhangs. From 120 restorations with overhang, 76 (63.33%) were amalgam restorations, and 44 (36.66%) were composite restorations. In total, 55.83% of them (67 restorations) were in maxilla and 44.16% (53 restorations) were in mandible. The prevalence of overhang in mandible was as 37.73% in mesial regions, 54.71% in distal regions, and 7.54% in mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) regions; in addition, the prevalence rate in maxilla was as 38.80% in mesial regions, 58.20% in distal regions, and 2.98% in MOD.

CONCLUSION: The overall frequency of restoration overhang was 19.60%, most of which was in amalgam restorations in comparison to composite restorations; and it is mostly seen in distal surfaces of maxillary teeth.

References

Moein Taghavi A, Fallah Tafti A, Talebi-Ardekani M, Haerian Ardakani A, Ansari G. Effect of fixed prosthesis treatments on Periodental tissues health. Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran 2005; 17(3): 52-60. [In Persian].

Aminian R, Ghassemi A, Shahali F. Prevalence of overhang in tooth-colored restorations conducted in operative department of Shahid Beheshti dental school: 2001-2002. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci 2006; 24(1): 8-13. [In Persian].

Alizadeh Oskouei P, Kimiaei S, Savadi Oskouei S, Asdagh S. Prevalence of proximal overhanging margins in posterior amalgam restorations performed by Tabriz Dental Faculty Students. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci 2009; 31(1): 53-6. [In Persian].

Chan DC, Chung AK. Management of idiopathic subgingival amalgam hypertrophy-the common amalgam overhang. Oper Dent 2009; 34(6): 753-8.

Brunsvold MA, Lane JJ. The prevalence of overhanging dental restorations and their relationship to periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1990; 17(2): 67-72.

Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MC. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2009; 37(9): 712-7.

Brunsvold MA, Lane JJ. The prevalence of overhanging dental restorations and their relationship to periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1990; 17(2): 67-72.

Aminian R, Ghassemi A, Shahali F. Prevalence of overhang in tooth colored restorations conducted in operative department of Shahid Beheshti dental school: 2001-2002. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci 2006; 24(1): 8-13. [In Persian].

Robbins JW. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Summitt JB, Rabbins JW, Hilton T, Schwartz RS, Editors. Fundamentals of operative dentistry: A contemporary approach. Batavia, IL: Quintessence Pub; 2006. p. 570-90.

Parsell DE, Streckfus CF, Stewart BM, Buchanan WT. The effect of amalgam overhangs on alveolar bone height as a function of patient age and overhang width. Oper Dent 1998; 23(2): 94-9.

Yasar F, Yesilova E, Akgunlu F. Alveolar bone changes under overhanging restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14(5): 543-9.

Mokeem SA. The impacts of amalgam overhang

removal on periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid volume. Pakistan Oral Dent J 2007; 27(1): 17-22.

Kuonen P, Huynh-Ba G, Krummen VS, Stossel EM, Rothlisberger B, Salvi GE, et al. Restoration margins in young adolescents: A clinical and radiographic study of Swiss Army recruits. Oral Health Prev Dent 2009; 7(4): 377-82.

Silness J. Fixed prosthodontics and periodontal health. Dent Clin North Am 1980; 24(2): 317-29.

Bjorn AL, Bjorn H, Grkovic B. Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to peridontal bone level. I. Metal fillings. Odontol Revy 1969; 20(3): 311-21.

Hakkarainen K, Ainamo J. Influence of overhanging posterior tooth restorations on alveolar bone height in adults. J Clin Periodontol 1980; 7(2): 114-20.

Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10(6): 563-78.

Leon AR. Amalgam restorations and periodontal disease. Br Dent J 1976; 140(11): 377-82.

Muller HP. The effect of artificial crown margins at the gingival margin on the periodontal conditions in a group of periodontally supervised patients treated with fixed bridges. J Clin Periodontol 1986; 13(2): 97-102.

Sikri VK, Sikri P. Overhanging interproximal silver amalgam restorations. Prevalence and side-effects.

Indian J Dent Res 1993; 4(1): 13-6.

Renggli HH, Regolati B. Gingival inflammation and plaque accumulation by well-adapted supragingival and subgingival proximal restorations. Helv Odontol Acta 1972; 16(2): 99-101.

Quadir F, Ali Abidi SY, Ahmed S. Overhanging amalgam restorations by undergraduate students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2014; 24(7): 485-8.

Svensson KG. Occurrence of proximal amalgam overhangs in Class II restorations and its relationship to secondary caries-a radiographic study [MSc Thesis]. Huddinge, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet Institutionen for Odontologi; 2003.

Pack AR, Coxhead LJ, McDonald BW. The prevalence of overhanging margins in posterior amalgam restorations and periodontal consequences. J Clin Periodontol 1990; 17(3): 145-52.

Shetty D, Shetty P, Sakri M. Comparing metal and transparent matrices in preventing gingival overhang with different resin material in class II restorations - An SEM Study. Pravara Medical Review 2010; 5(2): 26-7.

Tavangar M, Darabi F, Tayefeh Davalloo R, Vadiati Saberi B, Jahandideh Y, Kazemnejad Leili E, et al. The prevalence of restoration overhang in patients referred to the dental clinic of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Pathology and Surgery (J3D) 2016; 5(1): 18-23.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-10

How to Cite

1.
Ebrahimzadeh-Hassanabadi M, Gharib A, Moaddabi A. The overhang rate in posterior teeth restorations among a sample of patients from Sari City, Iran, in year 2017. Chron Dis J. 2019;7(3):160–164.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)